This provision in bankruptcy laws was put in to protect banks. A protection that they’ve clearly abused. It’s time to take it away.
This entry was posted
on Friday, May 29th, 2009 at 8:04 am and is filed under Q & A.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Responses to “Should congress reform bankruptcy laws to allow courts to modify primary mortgages so people can their homes?”
I can’t agree. The protection is that mortgage lenders have assurance that borrowers can’t just file bankruptcy and change their loan terms. How can we motivate mortgage lenders to keep giving loans if they have to be concerned the terms of those loan can be altered?
I understand that sometimes bad things just happen to people, but I’ve also seen plenty of instances where people are just careless with their finances. It’s not fair to punish lenders for borrower’s bad choices. Regardless of anything else, those borrowers did *choose* to take those loans and they did agree to pay them off completely.
May 31st, 2009 at 12:28 pm
I can’t agree. The protection is that mortgage lenders have assurance that borrowers can’t just file bankruptcy and change their loan terms. How can we motivate mortgage lenders to keep giving loans if they have to be concerned the terms of those loan can be altered?
I understand that sometimes bad things just happen to people, but I’ve also seen plenty of instances where people are just careless with their finances. It’s not fair to punish lenders for borrower’s bad choices. Regardless of anything else, those borrowers did *choose* to take those loans and they did agree to pay them off completely.
June 1st, 2009 at 7:29 pm
While I would make a fortune if I could do this, literally millions, I have to disagree. I was given cash money, I need to repay it.